Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Old 07-16-2008   #1
    Possible Higher Weight Limit For Trucks In Arkansas
Moosin' Around
 
Bullwinkle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,267
LITTLE ROCK - Facing a $19 billion shortfall for state highways over the next decade, Arkansas highway officials are carefully monitoring trucking industry lobbyists' efforts to get Congress to increase weight limits on roads.

The industry is lobbying federal lawmakers to increase the 80,000-pound maximum weight on interstate highways to meet greater demand for over-the-road transport. Some lawmakers say there are too many state-level exemptions and too little federal enforcement for the weight standard established 26 years ago to be effective.

The trucking industry cites a federal study that concluded allowing 97,000-pound, six-axle trucks on highways would reduce truck miles and accident exposure by 11 percent.

Such an increase could hasten the deterioration of roads, Randy Ort, spokesman for the Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department, said Tuesday.

But some trucking industry officials say an increase is necessary to reduce future highway congestion, the nation's reliance on foreign oil, carbon emissions and the costs of goods and transportation.

"We know that our economy is going to grow exponentially over the next 20 years and we're going to reach a point where the public must decide if it wants even more trucks on the highway, meaning more congestion, or whether they would consider putting more stuff in each truck," said Lane Kidd, spokesman for the Arkansas Trucking Association.

The industry is asking Congress to allow use of the triple trailer configuration, which some western states allow, according to Kidd. The trailers would be no longer than 28 feet, and the configuration could be used only on four-lane interstate highways in dry driving conditions during the daylight hours with rigid speed limit controls, he said.

Trucking companies also want Congress to allow states to set up new registration fees and requirements for tractor-trailer rigs to haul an additional 17,000 pounds as long as additional axles are installed, he said.

"Increased weights can potentially damage highways, but an additional axle could mitigate some of the extra weight," Ort said.

Source: Arkansas News Bureau
__________________
Now On Myspace! - http://www.myspace.com/thetruckersforum
Bullwinkle is online now  
Digg this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2008   #2
 
Moosin' Around
 
Bullwinkle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,267
The 6th axle would have to be a must, though I still don't really like this idea. I would rather see the weight limit go down, if anything. I can just imagine the thought of 97,000lb rigs on highways on a regular basis
__________________
Now On Myspace! - http://www.myspace.com/thetruckersforum
Bullwinkle is online now  
Digg this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2008   #3
 
Old School'd
 
SilverSurfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Nocona, Texas
Posts: 787
Send a message via Yahoo to SilverSurfer
Our infrastructure is in dire need of repair and ATA is lobbying for heavier trucks. This issue is another one of the many issues which indicates ATA's true intentions regarding who's interests they serve. Until our infrastructure has a major maintenance overhaul...there should not be any consideration of increasing truck weight. If anything - weight should be reduced until such repairs are effected.

-ss-
__________________
STAND UP, SPEAK OUT OR ACCEPT WHAT COMES!!!


[ May God Give Us All Strength For What's Coming ]
SilverSurfer is online now  
Digg this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2008   #4
 
Senior Member
 
lunachic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: florida
Posts: 1,503
Quote:
Originally Posted by SilverSurfer View Post
Our infrastructure is in dire need of repair and ATA is lobbying for heavier trucks. This issue is another one of the many issues which indicates ATA's true intentions regarding who's interests they serve. Until our infrastructure has a major maintenance overhaul...there should not be any consideration of increasing truck weight. If anything - weight should be reduced until such repairs are effected.

-ss-
When will they(them) understand, weight is the least of our worries.
Oh, I see away for the states to rape for more money,
but danger, most of the T.S. driver's and big boy pro's scare us with out a load hate to be around them 6th ax. or not.
Heavier trucks, maybe armor?
I know this is not funny, but if you think of the IDIOTS on the road now who can't understand big truck's and you never see anything explaining to them that they are not like car's and can't stop on a dime.
If they want to spend money why don't they run ads on how a big truck operates' and stopping distance differ's from car's, and blind spot's and my favorite drafting..........
__________________
BRING THEM HOME.
lunachic is online now  
Digg this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2008   #5
 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Hendersonville,NC
Posts: 426
Triples? You got to be kkidding me. I Know some do it now but I remember the 1st time I saw a double and thought they must be crazy. Notice the "study" says reduce accident "opportunties" - how about reality.
This is just another way to eliminate more drivers. More work, less safety for less money.
rebel is offline  
Digg this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2008   #6
 
Senior Member
 
lunachic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: florida
Posts: 1,503
Quote:
Originally Posted by rebel View Post
Triples? You got to be kkidding me. I Know some do it now but I remember the 1st time I saw a double and thought they must be crazy. Notice the "study" says reduce accident "opportunties" - how about reality.
This is just another way to eliminate more drivers. More work, less safety for less money.
more money for ark. we will all be paying for it, one way or another........
not all states now run under the g.v.w. of 80
__________________
BRING THEM HOME.

Last edited by lunachic; 07-16-2008 at 08:28 AM.
lunachic is online now  
Digg this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2008   #7
 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Hendersonville,NC
Posts: 426
Isn't Walmart based in Ark?
rebel is offline  
Digg this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why is Diesel higher than Gas ? Cerberus Trucking Industry News and Issues 21 05-25-2008 09:21 AM
Louisiana bill would limit trucks' lane use Trucking News Trucking Industry News and Issues 0 04-23-2008 07:16 PM
NAM Commends Supporters of Higher H-1B Visa Cap truckamok Trucking Industry News and Issues 0 04-02-2008 01:32 PM
Higher diesel fuel costs have area truckers hurting [Wisconsin] Bullwinkle Trucking Industry News and Issues 1 11-30-2007 01:53 PM
Grant to help train Arkansas truckers Staff Trucking Industry News and Issues 0 02-21-2007 07:57 AM